Landscapes of Desire
Artist Statement Cathy Laudenbach
Landscapes of Desire
Today the realities of life are increasingly assessed, fractured, multiplied and questioned through both the digital screen of the camera and the computer. What is the relationship between these flat micro-frames and the larger world? How can this contemporary relationship be assessed?
A camera has become the contemporary accessory. Pedro de Almeida writes in the latest Broadsheet, “With heads down and eyes glued to tiny handheld screens, most people prefer to let the distinction between reality and fantasy slide.” He could add as they navigate their way through contemporary life.
Yet , while the modern world has become acutely aware and reliant on the immediacy of the photographic image, what can be revealed in looking at how tourists are interacting in the world with cameras? German photographer Thomas Struth, one of the most significant contemporary photographers in the world today, explains “The camera doesn’t do anything by itself- photographs show what people look at and reveal their inner agenda.”1
This work is made with a camera - photographing tourists with cameras. How is the world being photographed today in a time with more tourists, more cameras but also more access to the Internet and tourist information.
The world is not the lonely planet it was and we don’t need a guidebook to navigate. Tourists can have access to most places in the world simply through clicking a computer screen. So how is the world being pictured and what does this reveal? The work comes from two places called Hallstatt, one built in China as a copy of a fifth century UNESCO listed town in Austria. Both are tourist towns – one a copy of the other.
While there is a level of humour to the work, as there can be in much human behaviour, tourist behaviours with cameras is revealing. Tourists appear to need to photograph. They don’t want other tourists in their images. They do want themselves in the images, often photographing themselves. The behaviours appear the same irrespective of place. It becomes hard to distinguish from the photographs the copy town and the real town: the towns, the behaviours and the tourist merge.
1 [1] http://www.theartnewspaper.com./articles/Phootgraphs-reveal-peoples-inner-agenda/2465 Thomas Struth by Louisa Buck Issue 226, July –August 2011. Accessed 31/12/2013.

TRANSCRIPT:
M indicates the speaker is the interviewer, Maurice.
C indicates the speaker is the artist, Cathy Laudenbach
M So, Cathy. who’s come all the way from the A.C.T but who’s lived in The Territory before, going back a few years now but who has come and gone
since then.
C Yep.
M Let’s just start with the title of this exhibition, Landscapes of Desire. I’m just interested in, firstly how you would describe these works as landscapes?
C Well, the landscapes for me, because this is a particular place so a landscape is about a place, a particular place, it doesn’t have to be a traditional landscape.
So, this is, these works were made in a particular place which is called Hallstatt See in China, in Southern China, that is totally based on an old salt village
where, in Austria, it’s also called Hallstatt. It’s a fifth century United Nations village and it’s still, it’s actually an anthropological site as well and a culture site.
It’s been a working village from the fifth century until now so it’s, you know, it’s a very important place for a lot of research as well as being a tourist destination
for a lot of Europeans. And, a couple of years ago, … just a couple of years ago, Minmetals, a big Chinese company, went and measured it up, brick by brick,
stone by stone and rebuilt it, rebuilt the town to the best of their ability in southern China. So, it’s located outside Shenzhen, like that’s probably the biggest
city near it … I think, about fifteen million (15 million) people and Guangzhou is the next bit city. So, it’s all in southern China. And, yeah, so for me it’s
an obvious landscape.
M Yeah, so, in the sense that it’s a Landscape of Desire, I guess it’s also talking about interior landscapes, more psychological, mental-scapes in a way, Which I’ll
ask you a little bit about later but I’m also wondering whether you had worked in China? Because, basically the context for this show also ties in with a PhD
that Cath is doing. My understanding is the PhD is pretty much centred on this, on your photographs based on this particular Hallstatt See here and Hallstatt
in Austria.
C Yep.
M So, it’s really quite specific to those two places.
C Mmm.
M But had you, so had you worked in China before that? And so, in a sense I guess that must also play into the project. I mean, coming into a new country, a new
country to you, what sort of layers are there for you in doing that? What are the layers of the processes or is that very much part of your approach, in terms of
dealing with working in a new country?
C Yeah, okay. So, I think it’s an interesting thing. So, perhaps it’s a ‘landscape of Desire’ for me as well. Yeah, I’ll just answer some of your question.
M (Laughs).
C No, I’ve never worked in China before so that’s the answer to that, but I have actually worked in, overseas before in my work and I’ve made two large bodies of
work in Japan. And, I lived in Japan for three years and I’ve been backwards and forwards. I’ve done two different residencies now in Japan and plus just being
there. I took an exchange from the ANU. I took a group of students at one stage and I was lucky enough to do the Chiyoda studio two years ago in Tokyo
[Australia Council for the Arts residency]; if anyone wants to know about that, it’s a great experience, amazing residency. And I worked in Fukushima which is
where, some of you might know about, where the nuclear accident happened and at Takayama. And I’ve always been interested in sites and just to go back a
little bit, my real interest in, and I think this will answer Maurice’s question hopefully. My interest in photography is really about that I’ve always, I’ve been a
photographer for quite a long time now, maybe fifteen solo exhibitions that have been shown around as well as obviously, group exhibitions, and I really believe
that a camera can reveal something that can’t be shown in other mediums. And, for me, that’s been my personal driving force I think and there’s a
photographer called Dianne Arbus, an American, she’s not alive now. And, she said, famously, that a photograph is a secret about a secret, and I think for me,
that’s what’s driven me forever. A lot of people have said a lot of similar things but I think that sort of sums it up. So, I’ve always been interested in sites and
made work at particular sites so I think Cath (Bowdler) last night talked about some of those sites, like I’ve worked at Barrow Creek in the Territory, where
Peter Falconio disappeared. You probably know that Territory story, so trying to sort of get under the landscape to see what was, you know, if there was any
remnants. Of course, I’m not ridiculous. I don’t believe that I’m showing something that’s not there. I’m not sort of suggesting that. I’m suggesting that a camera
can reveal things that maybe we can’t see, but not, you know, ridiculous things. And, that’s partly what a photograph is and it’s partly the way that you
photograph something. Okay, so I think that’s the first part of the question.
The second part is, like, I’ve always sort of also been a researcher. Now, that’s sort of obviously pretty transparent in that I’m sort of three quarters of the way
through a PhD. But, I’ve always done a lot of research in my work and at the moment I’m doing a research PhD which is an evolving process, that’s a Doctor
of Philosophy, and so that’s been a wonderful opportunity to pick researching a topic. So, I picked this place because it’s a site and I’d found it on the Internet
and I’d never been to either of the two Hallstatts. But, I just was fascinated with what, when I read about it I thought, ‘What is a camera going to be able to show
about places being replicated from a place that’s a United Nations listed historical town. If I go to this place in China, what am I going to be able to reveal with
my camera?’ Of course, I didn’t know that I’d be able to reveal anything. And, then, when I went there, plus I have been to the real Hallstatt, I found that these
people are making their own landscape of desire which is in a way is my own landscape of desire too. So, they’re going there and getting dressed up, and I had
no idea what I would find. But, I found this, and to be honest, the day that I saw it, I was petrified. I didn’t expect that people would be doing this, like because
it, sort of very unusual that it sort of also refers to the history of photography because that’s what people did in the beginning of photography. They paid a
photographer to photograph them in a landscape and that’s called cartes de visites, and then you know that even Aboriginal people were forced to be put in
front of back drops and photographed so we had it in Australia. So, it was just such an exciting discovery really and so now this is where my research is centred,
but it wasn’t going to be there. I just made so many discoveries there that I’m going to go back now and I’m going to make a film and make more large-scale
images. I’ll be actually going back in three and a half weeks.
M Oh. Three and a half weeks? And how long do you think you’ll stay there?
C For three weeks, yep.
M Oh, okay.
C Three, four weeks there, yeah.
M I was going to ask you about how, but you’ve already touched on it, how this project also has implications in terms of the history of photography. You have
already touched on that.
C Mmm.
M I guess I’m interested in how, do you, I guess you went there, not knowing in some ways it would become a project also about how tourists use a camera. Do
you think the way that tourism operates there, what does this say to you about tourism in general and what does it say to you about tourism in China?
C Yeah, that’s another part of the study because I, and that’s another great joy I think of, you know, being given a scholarship to do a PhD, that I realise that it’s
so much about tourism. And, I’ve never actually, and my background is obviously is in art. And, you know, I’ve done quite a bit of study and lectured and done
a research masters and stuff, but I’d never studied tourism theory, which some people here might know is a huge discipline in itself. And, so I had to sort of
delve into a lot of books. And so the first year of my studies was just learning about tourism theory and learning what there theorists said and that’s just
anabsolutely fascinating thing, really. And, so, basically what I suppose it comes down to is now we’re all what we call post-tourists, whether you like it or not.
Everyone in this room is a post-tourist because if you can turn on a computer, you can travel to anywhere you like, straight after this. You know, you can go
into the Tate Modern and have a look at the whole collection while you’re sitting in your lounge room in Darwin. Or, you can be in Africa somewhere. So,
anywhere you want really, and so that’s called post-tourist and that’s been facilitated by new technology really. So, that’s an amazing thing too for now and for
my study but these people, like to me, are actually post-post-tourists because they’ve gone beyond that because they’ve seen Hallstatt, they can all go on and
see it. Mostly, I have to say, the people that I could talk to here, not all of them could speak English and I can’t speak Chinese. They just said they felt like they
were in Europe even though they hadn’t been there but they’d seen a lot of photos of Europe. They didn’t actually specifically say they thought they were in
Hallstatt. So, they’ve, for me they’re post-post-tourists which is term that I’m kind of talking about because they’ve taken a site and they’ve just turned it into
their own, what they want it to be. So, while it’s a false site, they’ve turned it back onto what they want. So they get dressed up in wedding clothes or fancy dress
or as Mau’s army and then they pay a photographer to live out a particular fantasy.
M Thanks very much, Cath. If someone has a question from the floor, we’re happy to take one, or you don’t have to have one. And, while you might think of one, I
guess the other thing in your practice, that I’m aware of at least, there is a strong portraiture interest.
C Yep.
M And, I know you’ve also taken sites, photos of sites without people.
C Yep.
M But obviously, there is a level of portraiture happening here: one, the images of people that you’re taking, the selfies that people are taking, the portraits that the
photographers within the image are taking.
C Yep.
M Do you, I mean, in terms of your own interest in portraiture, do you see this as a kind of very different interest? Or, maybe just a comment around that.
C Yeah, most, like it’s true, I suppose a parallel practice in a way is that I’ve often photographed people and I think it was mentioned last night that I’ve, for a long
time now, maybe over twenty years, been returning to Wadeye to photograph the Wadeye Community. I have a connection from there from when I was a child.
I know people from Wadeye and they’ve stayed with me in Canberra. I just wanted to, because I knew those people I thought it was an important thing to and
an interesting thing to document them and I’ve had exhibitions out there and I’ve had an exhibition here in Darwin and in Canberra. But, I haven’t shown
much of that work for a long time but then I did another big study called Australian Families Today, where I’ve photographed families, the changing nature of
families. So, yeah, I’ve had a history of portraiture. And, I think this work, and then after that really, I’ve made a lot of works without people and a lot of
exhibitions that I’ve had, one called Familiars, which was sites based on stories that people told me where they’d had an experience of a ghost. And, the ones
I’ve told you about Barrow Creek and the beach, and yeah, quite a few in old hotel rooms and they were all with no people. And, I think this really, I’ve just
only thought of this now, but it’s combining both of those interests really, that I’ve returned, you know, brought in the portraits and also with landscape so it’s,
yeah, it’s a sort of merging of two, two interests that I’ve had for a long time in my work.
M Thanks very much Cath. We might leave it there. There is a catalogue with an essay on this particular series for people to take if they want and I do hope we do
get an opportunity to show some of your archive of Wadeye portraits so stay tuned for that - probably next year with any luck.
Artist Talks, Saturday 22 February, 2015, 12 noon
INTERVIEWER: Maurice O’Riordan, Director, NCCArt
PARTICIPANTS: Cathy Laudenbach (exhibiting artist)
All images are installation views of the exhibition at NCCArt; photos: Fiona Morrison





